MOON
Server: Apache/2.2.31 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.31 OpenSSL/0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 mod_bwlimited/1.4
System: Linux csr818.wilogic.com 2.6.18-419.el5xen #1 SMP Fri Feb 24 22:50:37 UTC 2017 x86_64
User: digitals (531)
PHP: 5.4.45
Disabled: NONE
Upload Files
File: //usr/local/ssl/share/gtk-doc/html/cairo/bindings-return-values.html
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<title>Multiple return values</title>
<meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.68.1">
<link rel="start" href="index.html" title="Cairo: A Vector Graphics Library">
<link rel="up" href="language-bindings.html" title="Appendix&#160;A.&#160;Creating a language binding for cairo">
<link rel="prev" href="bindings-memory.html" title="Memory Management">
<link rel="next" href="bindings-overloading.html" title="Overloading and optional arguments">
<meta name="generator" content="GTK-Doc V1.7 (XML mode)">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css" type="text/css">
<link rel="part" href="pt01.html" title="Part&#160;I.&#160;Tutorial">
<link rel="part" href="pt02.html" title="Part&#160;II.&#160;Reference">
<link rel="chapter" href="Drawing.html" title="Drawing">
<link rel="chapter" href="Fonts.html" title="Fonts">
<link rel="chapter" href="Surfaces.html" title="Surfaces">
<link rel="chapter" href="Support.html" title="Utilities">
<link rel="index" href="ix01.html" title="Index">
<link rel="index" href="ix02.html" title="Index of new symbols in 1.2">
<link rel="appendix" href="language-bindings.html" title="Appendix&#160;A.&#160;Creating a language binding for cairo">
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" text="black" link="#0000FF" vlink="#840084" alink="#0000FF">
<table class="navigation" id="top" width="100%" summary="Navigation header" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2"><tr valign="middle">
<td><a accesskey="p" href="bindings-memory.html"><img src="left.png" width="24" height="24" border="0" alt="Prev"></a></td>
<td><a accesskey="u" href="language-bindings.html"><img src="up.png" width="24" height="24" border="0" alt="Up"></a></td>
<td><a accesskey="h" href="index.html"><img src="home.png" width="24" height="24" border="0" alt="Home"></a></td>
<th width="100%" align="center">Cairo: A Vector Graphics Library</th>
<td><a accesskey="n" href="bindings-overloading.html"><img src="right.png" width="24" height="24" border="0" alt="Next"></a></td>
</tr></table>
<div class="sect1" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="bindings-return-values"></a>Multiple return values</h2></div></div></div>
<p>
      There are a number of functions in the cairo API that have
      multiple <em class="firstterm">out parameters</em> or
      <em class="firstterm">in-out parameters</em>. In some languages
      these can be translated into multiple return values. In Python,
      what is:
    </p>
<pre class="programlisting">
cairo_user_to_device (cr, &amp;x, &amp;y);</pre>
<p>
      can by mapped to:
    </p>
<pre class="programlisting">
(x, y) = cr.user_to_device (cr, x, y);</pre>
<p>
      but many languages don't have provisions for multiple return
      values, so it is necessary to introduce auxiliary types.
      Most of the functions that require the auxiliary types
      require a type that would, in C, look like
    </p>
<pre class="programlisting">
typedef struct _cairo_point cairo_point_t;
struct _cairo_point {
    double x;
    double y;
}</pre>
<p>
      The same type should be used both for functions that use a pair
      of coordinates as an absolute position, and functions that use
      a pair of coordinates as a displacement. While an argument could
      be made that having a separate &#8220;distance&#8221; type is more correct,
      it is more likely just to confuse users.
    </p>
<pre class="programlisting">
void
cairo_user_to_device (cairo_t *cr, double *x, double *y);

void
cairo_user_to_device_distance (cairo_t *cr, double *dx, double *dy);

void
cairo_device_to_user (cairo_t *cr, double *x, double *y);

void
cairo_device_to_user_distance (cairo_t *cr, double *dx, double *dy);

void
cairo_matrix_transform_distance (cairo_matrix_t *matrix, double *dx, double *dy);

void
cairo_matrix_transform_point (cairo_matrix_t *matrix, double *x, double *y);

void
cairo_get_current_point (cairo_t *cr, double *x, double *y);
    </pre>
<p>
      There are also a couple of functions that return four values
      representing a rectangle. These should be mapped to a
      &#8220;rectangle&#8221; type that looks like:
    </p>
<pre class="programlisting">
typedef struct _cairo_rectangle cairo_rectangle_t;
struct _cairo_rectangle {
    double x;
    double y;
    double width;
    double height;
}</pre>
<p>
      The C function returns the rectangle as a set of two points to
      facilitate rounding to integral extents, but this isn't worth
      adding a &#8220;box&#8221; type to go along with the more obvious
      &#8220;rectangle&#8221; representation.
    </p>
<p class="remark"><i><span class="remark">
      Q: Would it make sense here to define a standard
      <code class="function">cairo_rectangle_round()</code> method
      that language bindings should map?
    </span></i></p>
<pre class="programlisting">
void
cairo_stroke_extents (cairo_t *cr,
		      double *x1, double *y1,
		      double *x2, double *y2);

void
cairo_fill_extents (cairo_t *cr,
		    double *x1, double *y1,
		    double *x2, double *y2);
    </pre>
</div>
</body>
</html>